Abstract：Faced with the tendency to refuse the context of society and history, to be fond of self-prove in criticism methods and the tending of formalism in critical field, the paper, by means of five critical methods which are stylistic analysis?ethical criticism?myth criticism?Freudianism criticism and structuralism criticism, illustrates that: none of these models of interpretation is complete in themselves, and that their appearance of autonomy results from the limits and boundaries arbitrarily during their interpretative process. If we prolong any one of these methods, even on its own terms, we always reemerge into the historical dimension itself, which thus comes as an implicit or explicit completion of all literary analysis or interpretation.
