|
|
|
| On Sen and Nussbaum’s Criticism on Rawls’s Theory of Justice |
| Gong Qun |
| School of Philosophy， Renmin University of China， Beijing 100872 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Rawls’s theory of justice is the most important one in contemporary political philosophy. Rawls’s theory is derivation from on the contract approach and the distributive justice is of equality theory for resources allocation on the primary goods. Rawls’s theory of contract and the system of social cooperation imply the possibility that the disabled person is not included in the scope of social justice. Amartya Sen， Martha Nussbaum and others criticized Rawls’s approach of his theory and the resource equality of distributive justice，and proposed the methodology of capacity equality. They have made a sharp criticism of the contract theory，which does not include disabled patients. Rawls responded to their criticism and still adhered to his own views.
|
|
Received: 25 September 2017
|
|
|
|
| [1] |
Yang Meng. How Government Green Subsidies Motivate Green Innovation of Corporations——Exposition and Evidence from Strategic Response Perspective[J]. journal1, 2024, 63(1): 61-74. |
| [2] |
Lei Wanpeng Yin Junyao. The Threshold Effect of Internet Use on the Self-Management Ability of Low-Age Left behind Children[J]. journal1, 2024, 63(1): 156-164. |
| [3] |
Lin Gang. Western Liberal Democracy： Theoretic Tension and Practical Deviation[J]. journal1, 2023, 62(3): 90-105. |
| [4] |
Du Shizhong. The Theoretical Sources， Empirical Grounds and Practical Approaches of Institutional Moral Education Theory[J]. journal1, 2023, 62(3): 160-169. |
| [5] |
Zhang Bichun. “The Evergreen Path”： Constructing Residents' Participation Capacity from the Perspective of Feasible Capacity[J]. journal1, 2023, 62(2): 73-80. |
| [6] |
Wang Hongcai Zheng Yaqian. Research on the Measurement and Developmental Characteristics of College Students’ Innovative and Entrepreneurial Abilities in China[J]. journal1, 2022, 61(3): 155-165. |
|
|
|
|
2017, Vol. 56 
