|
Abstract Although “The Third Generation” poetry has been written into various literary history with similar definitions， there are great differences among the definitions of this group of poets between poets and poets， as well as poets and scholars. Therefore， a controversy over the naming of “The Third Generation” poems has arisen. “The Third Generation” poetry， which is formed with the aim of rebelling against “misty poetry”， makes it have the tolerance of combining to fight with “misty poetry” at the beginning； at the same time， because of the difference of style characteristics， it also makes “The Third Generation” poetry take on the exclusiveness of genre. As a strategy， “anti-culture” is the product of the influence and anxiety of “misty poetry”. Self-historicization is an important means for them to fight against anxiety and enter the established order of literature.
|
|
Received: 17 November 2020
|
|
|
|
2020, Vol. 59 
