Abstract：The relationship between attractions and communities has always been an area of great concern for theoretical researchand tourism practice， and it is also a core issue that is unavoidable in achieving high-quality development of destinations. Taking tourism islanding effect that reflects the isolation relationship between attractions and communities as a tool， in this paper the reasons for the conflicts between closed attractions and surrounding communities are illustrated and corresponding regulatorymeasures are put forward.The main conclusions are as follows. 1) The connotation of space and rights in the theoretical tools of tourism islanding effect have high applicability in analyzing the conflicts between closed attractions and surrounding communities. 2) The process of capitalization of tourism resources produced three spatial effects： polarization， closure， and siphon， making the relationship between closed attractions and surrounding communities present three kinds conflicts of coordination， competition ， and confrontation with increasing levels of antagonism. 3) According to the reasons of the three types of conflicts， three ideas of reducing differences are proposed， includingstrengtheningdiffusion， and weakening confrontation toregulatetheseconflicts. Analyzing these conflicts between attractions and communities based on the perspective of tourism islanding effects not only expands the research field of community participation in tourism development， but also helps promote high-quality development and maintain social stabilization.
2022, Vol. 56 
