2025年04月06日 星期日 主页   |   首页   |   期刊介绍   |   编 委 会   |   投稿指南   |   期刊订阅   |   编辑队伍   |   留言板   |   联系我们   |   English
华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版)  2018, Vol. 57 Issue (5): 45-54    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
农村宅基地“三权分置”的权利结构与实施路径——基于大理市银桥镇农村宅基地制度改革试点
刘圣欢 杨砚池
华中师范大学 经济与工商管理学院, 湖北 武汉 430079
The Rights Structure and Implementary Path of Rural Homesteads’“Three Rights Division”:An Experimental Study of Yinqiao Town in Dali City
Liu Shenghuan  Yang Yanchi
College of Economics and Business Administration, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079
全文: PDF (0 KB)   HTML (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 农村宅基地所有权、资格权、使用权“三权分置”是农村土地制度改革的重大举措,具有现实的实践基础和迫切的改革诉求,亟待理论支撑、法律保障和实践检验。大理市银桥镇在宅基地制度运行和试点改革中呈现的改变宅基地使用主体和增加宅基地功能等特征初具“三权分置”的雏形,但随之产生的外来人口挤占村集体资源和管理缺失隐含着社会风险等问题迫切要求对“三权分置”进行深入探究。本文在对农村宅基地“三权”问题的国内外研究进行简要梳理后,基于大理市银桥镇农村宅基地的改革试点,重点考察宅基地“三权分置”的权利结构与实施路径。在明晰产权结构的基础下,落实集体所有权的路径是完善收益权、处分权和管理权;稳定农户宅基地资格权的路径是通过完善土地调整分配机制、产权登记颁证、抵押担保贷款等方式保障居住权和财产权;适度放活使用权的路径是保障农户居住权、有序放活流转权、释放发展权红利。深入推进宅基地“三权分置”,必须严守改革底线,确保社会和谐稳定;完善相关法律法规,增强制度执行预期;注重还权赋能,彰显各项权能权益。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
刘圣欢 杨砚池
关键词 宅基地 三权分置 产权 权利结构    
Abstract:The division of ownership, ration and use of rural homesteads is a major measure in the reform of rural homestead system, which has a great practical significance and is badly in need of theoretical guidance, legal protection and further reform. In the process of rural homestead reform in Yinqiao Town, such practice as changing the homestead users and increasing its functions has become the embryonic form of“Three Rights Division”.However,some problems have also shown up, including collective resources having been occupied by people from other places and a lack of effective managements. So there is a pressing need for deeper and further explorations of “Three Rights Division” mechanism. After a brief review of rural homesteads’“Three Rights Division” issues from home and abroad,the essay mainly explores its rights structure and implementary path,based on the rural homesteads reform carried out in Yinqiao Town.It is concluded that: the practical experience in Yinqiao shows that the core of guaranteeing the collective ownership is to optimize the income right,disposal right and management right; it is an effective way to guarantee the farmers’ property right by the land adjustment and distribution mechanism, issuing the property certificate of the homestead, and the mortgage loan;The path of moderate release of the right to use is to protect the right to live, smoothly release the right to transfer, release the dividend of the right to development; protecting the villagers’ residence, smoothly transferring use rights, and permitting commercial operation on the homestead play a key role in moderately liberalizing the land-use right and releasing the reform bonus.To further promote the “Division of Three Rights” of rural homesteads,it is very important to take these measures including adherence to the bottom line of the reform in order to ensure social harmony and stability,empowerment of farmers.
Key wordshomestead    Division of Three Rights    property rights    rights structure
收稿日期: 2018-09-20     
引用本文:   
刘圣欢 杨砚池. 农村宅基地“三权分置”的权利结构与实施路径——基于大理市银桥镇农村宅基地制度改革试点[J]. 华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2018, 57(5): 45-54.
Liu Shenghuan  Yang Yanchi. The Rights Structure and Implementary Path of Rural Homesteads’“Three Rights Division”:An Experimental Study of Yinqiao Town in Dali City. journal1, 2018, 57(5): 45-54.
链接本文:  
https://journal.ccnu.edu.cn/sk/CN/     或     https://journal.ccnu.edu.cn/sk/CN/Y2018/V57/I5/45
版权所有 © 《华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版)》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn