|
|
|
| The Trade-Off Logic of Decentralization and Coordination：A Study on the Implementation of Rural Environmental Governance Policies |
| Li Chenxing |
| (School of Preparatory Education， South-Central University for Nationalities， Wuhan 430074) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Rural environmental governance is a critical issue in the construction of China’s ecological civilization in the new era， and its policy implementation effectiveness determines the effects of the Rural Revitalization Strategy. For a long time， the policy effectiveness in China has mostly relied on the government’s leadership and supervision in the policy implementation， which has been divided into the “decentralized” policy implementation approach characterized by focusing on the division of labor and responsibility， and the “coordinating” policy implementation approach characterized by focusing on the departmental collaboration. Due to the uneven distribution of power and responsibility， and the alienation of the rural environmental interests and other obstacles， there are defects in the existing policy implementation methods， which are manifested as the bottleneck in efficiency and operational suspensions in practice. With the continuous improvement in the standards of rural environmental policy implementation， relevant policy implementation methods need to be further developed and innovated. On the one hand， we should maintain a full understanding of the ways in which policies are implemented， accurately identify the types of interests and their relationships， based upon which the path of choosing the right rural environmental policy implementation is formed. At the same time， the ownership structure and cultural basis in the implementation of rural environmental policy are examined to enrich the theoretical extension of rural environmental governance policy implementation. On the other hand， we should focus on the allocation of power and responsibility， optimize the micro-environment， and innovate the “coordinated” policy implementation mechanism， so as to provide guarantee and assistance for the scientific implementation of rural environmental governance policies.
|
|
Received: 18 March 2022
|
|
|
|
| [1] |
Xue Qin Zeng Xin. Hot Topics and Cutting-Edge Trends in Rural China Studies over the Past 20 Years (2004-2023)——A Bibliometric Analysis Based on the Core Column of the Journal of Central China Normal University (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)[J]. journal1, 2024, 63(5): 64-79. |
| [2] |
Wang Qingjun Yu Lang. Environmental Justice in Service of Rural Ecological Revitalization and an Interpretation of Its Logic[J]. journal1, 2024, 63(2): 96-105. |
| [3] |
Yuan Fangcheng Zhou Weilong. The Dynamic Mechanism and Logic of the Urban-Rural Integration at the County-Level in the Process of Chinese Path to Modernization[J]. journal1, 2023, 62(6): 49-59. |
| [4] |
Hu Pingjiang. Villager Council Representative System： The Rural Practice of People’s Democracy in the Whole Process and Its Realization Mechanism——Taking the Villager Council of GL District of H Village in Jiangxi as an Example[J]. journal1, 2022, 61(6): 29-37. |
| [5] |
Rao Changlin Zhao Sixu. The Influencing Factors and Action Approaches for the Effect of Intergovernmental Collaboration in Governance of Cross-Domain Environmental Pollution——A Qualitative Comparative Analysis Based on Twelve Cases[J]. journal1, 2022, 61(4): 51-61. |
| [6] |
Yin Chengjie. The Long-Term Mechanism and Strategy of the Effective Transition from Consolidating and Expanding the Achievements of Poverty Alleviation to Rural Revitalization[J]. journal1, 2022, 61(1): 25-30. |
|
|
|
|
2022, Vol. 61 
